Kuzey Cekirge vs Charles Minc Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cekirge vs Minc analysis and find out who is favored!
Kuzey Cekirge vs Charles Minc Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cekirge 1 - 0 Minc
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cekirge has won 47.39% of points on their second serve, while Minc has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cekirge, in recent form, has won 50.1% of their opponent's second serve points, while Minc has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.93% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cekirge has saved 49.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Minc has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cekirge has won 67.61% of matches played (W/L 48/ 23), with Minc winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cekirge has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 133/ 83), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 63/ 47). Minc has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 12/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Cekirge has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.61% of matches (W/L 48/ 23), where as Minc has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cekirge winning 1 times and Minc being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cekirge winning 2 and Minc winning 0. The last match between Cekirge and Minc was at the M15 Torello, 09-12-2020, First, Hard with Kuzey Cekirge getting the victory 6-4 7-6(1).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cekirge and Minc have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cekirge winning 0 times and Minc 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Cekirge winning 1, and Minc 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cekirge has played against opponents with an average rank of 110.72 while Minc has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cekirge has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Minc has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cekirge has converted 46.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Minc has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Kuzey Cekirge
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
A
Plays
Charles Minc
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
60% (196-130)
Career Total W/L
38% (24-40)
73% (32-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Kuzey Cekirge | Charles Minc |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 2:24:0 | 2:24:0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (48/82) | 48% (46/95) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (31/48) | 65% (30/46) |
2nd Serve Win% | 56% (19/34) | 43% (21/49) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (4/16) | 25% (3/12) |
Return Points W% | 46% (44/95) | 39% (32/82) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 7-6(1) |
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Charles Minc
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
48%
(
46 of
95)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Kuzey Cekirge | Charles Minc |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 73% (32/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 66% (69/35) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (562/458) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 73% (22/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.06 | 0 |
Aces Total | 30 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.11 | 0 |
DFs Total | 53 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 98.2 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (964/1481) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 62% (593/964) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (245/517) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 47% (77/165) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (636/1439) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 73% (32/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (31/43) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (10/15) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 92% (25/23) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 8% (25/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 47% (19/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Kuzey Cekirge Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Laurent Lokoli
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Harry Wendelken
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Benoit Torcq
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
46%
(
19 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
53%
(
31 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
52
Total Points Won
56
|
0-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Paul Woerner
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
81%
(
73 of
90)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
48 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Stijn Slump
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
38%
(
23 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Vit Kalina
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
4-6 6-2 11-9 | H2H |
view more
Charles Minc Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Mihai Alexandru Coman
Player
Charles Minc
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
QF |
Hong-Lin Fu
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
3-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Liam Hignett
Player
Charles Minc
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alexandre Reco
Player
Charles Minc
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Charles Minc
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Charles Minc
Player
Hazem Naow
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more